Power BI vs Domo: AI-Powered BI Comparison

Feature-by-Feature Comparison Table
Dimension | | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Demo Playground Availability and quality of demo playground for testing the tool before purchase. | ||
| ||
Pricing Structure Pricing model and cost structure of the BI tool. | ||
| User & Capacity Based Free account, user-based licenses, and capacity-based pricing for enterprise. source | Consumption-Based Credit System Pay for what you use with credit system and base user fee starting at $750/year per user. source |
| $9,000+/year Power BI Embedded starts at $735.91/month for an A1 node (1 vCore) and increases with node type and count. source | $50,000-200,000/year Small businesses $30,000/year, enterprise-level organizations can exceed $100,000 annually. source |
Visualizations Chart and visualization capabilities of the tool. | ||
| ![]() Hundreds of native chart types including bar, pie, line, area, matrix, and advanced visuals. source | 150+ Native Chart Types Over 150 native chart types including pie, line, bar charts, maps, scatter plots, and Gantt charts. source |
| ![]() Custom visuals from AppSource marketplace and self-developed using PBIViz tools. source | Extensive Customization Customize visuals and dashboards with no-code design approach for personalized layouts and themes. source |
| ![]() Custom styling through JSON themes with color palettes, typography, and branding. source | Personalized Branding Extensive custom styling and branding with user-friendly no-code design interface. source |
| ![]() Smart Narratives, embedded text summaries, and Copilot for conversational insights. source | AI-Enhanced Data Stories Conversational AI (AI Chat) for natural language questions and automated alerts for key data changes. source |
Ease of Use & Self-Service How user-friendly and self-service oriented the tool is for non-technical users. | ||
| Interactive Drilldowns Drilldowns, filters, and click-through exploration for deeper data insights. source | Interactive Data Exploration Interactive dashboards with filters and customizable views for intuitive data analysis. source |
| Q&A Visual AI-assisted natural language queries using Q&A visual for instant answers. source | AI-Driven Data Exploration AI Chat for natural language questions and instant actionable insights through conversational AI. source |
| ![]() AI-assisted DAX calculations with point-and-click analytics for common operations. source | ❌ No explicit built-in calculation features mentioned in documentation. source |
| ![]() User-friendly report canvas with drag-and-drop builders and guided tours. source | ❌ No explicit report building features mentioned in documentation. source |
| ![]() AI insights, auto-charting, natural language queries, and Key Influencer visual. source | ❌ No explicit AI-assisted analytics features mentioned in documentation. source |
Data Delivery How data and reports are delivered to end users. | ||
| Custom Alerts Custom alerts and scheduled subscriptions for timely information delivery. source | Automated Alerts Automated alerts for key data changes to keep users updated on important information. source |
| ![]() Secure sharing via Teams, PowerPoint, Excel with PDF, CSV, Excel export options. source | ❌ No explicit sharing or distribution features mentioned in documentation. source |
Embedded Analytics Capabilities for embedding analytics into other applications. | ||
| Azure PaaS Power BI Embedded as Azure PaaS for embedding interactive reports into applications. source | Embedded Analytics Embed analytics into any application, portal, or website to extend data reach and deliver insights. source |
| Custom Styling Custom styling and branding of dashboards using themes and color palettes. source | Custom Branding White-labeling and custom theming for embedded content to reflect brand's look and feel. source |
| ❌ No direct embedded report builder for end users in embedded context. source | Self-Serve Analytics Simple drag-and-drop tools for teams to create visualizations within embedded content. source |
Reliability & Performance System reliability, performance optimization, and monitoring capabilities. | ||
| Import Mode Import mode, pre-aggregation, and summary tables for performance optimization. source | ❌ No specific information on query optimization, caching, pushdown, or pre-aggregation mentioned. source |
| ❌ No explicit built-in monitoring, freshness indicators, or error alerts. source | Automated Alerts Automated alerts for key data changes, but no explicit freshness indicators or error alerts mentioned. source |
Semantic Modeling Data modeling and semantic layer capabilities. | ||
| ![]() Semantic modeling with OneLake data hub for single source of truth. source | ❌ No explicit semantic layer or consistent metrics enforcement mechanisms mentioned in documentation. source |
| ❌ No explicit Git version control for semantic models. source | ❌ No information about Git version control for managing semantic models or BI artifacts mentioned. source |
| ❌ No explicit automated metadata sync from dbt or data warehouses. source | ❌ No explicit automated metadata synchronization from dbt or data warehouses mentioned. source |
| ❌ No explicit analytics-as-code for dashboards or models. source | ❌ No information about defining dashboards or models in YAML/DSL formats or CI/CD workflows mentioned. source |
Security and Governance Security features and governance capabilities. | ||
| ![]() Microsoft security standards with data governance and sensitivity labeling. source | Enterprise-Level Security Enterprise-level security, compliance, and governance with SSO and encryption capabilities. source |
| ❌ No explicit audit compliance features mentioned in documentation. source | ❌ No explicit audit compliance features mentioned in documentation. source |
| ❌ No explicit data masking or encryption features mentioned. source | ❌ No explicit data masking or encryption features mentioned in documentation. source |
| ❌ No explicit monitoring or logging capabilities mentioned. source | ❌ No explicit monitoring or logging capabilities mentioned in documentation. source |
Compare Power BI with:
Compare Domo with:
Community Discussions
Discover what other practitioners are discussing about this topic.
Yes, mostly I use it for refining my SQL queries or to see what are the different ways in which I can solve the same problem. It's quite helpful in that sense.
I also use it to review queries of my juinor team members. To see if I may have missed out on anything. It helps with that extra set of eyes at times.
And to create documentation for dashboards/reports.
I also use it to ask questions which I can use in stakeholder meetings for requirement gathering. For eg, I explain the context of the meeting and then ask the AI to roleplay with regards to what questions I should be asking in that specific meeting. Helps me prepare and also helps understand perspectives from different POVs.
My guess is that the bulk of the companies are just bull$#!7ing with the buzzword. To successfully introduce AI into your BI, you need clean orderly data.
Go ahead and tell me the last time everyone cheered when the data governance team came through the door.
People mostly rool their eyes and crawl into a ball.
So - C suite seems to think AI can “answer all their questions”.
So I respond with “what are the questions you are wondering? I can pull data, schedule reports, to your inbox, or build live dashboards with graphs in any color of the rainbow!” - which is usually met with blank stares.
That’s why I know AI isn’t worth the trouble. It’s a solution to a problem we don’t have.
I am not a professional analyst but I have use ChatGPT in the past to help me write SQL queries, so I can see some appeals with them, although I also can't imagine how these tools can deal with the messy nature of badly maintained tables with duplicated names and nonsensical field names etc.
I also see some of these tools advocate for dynamically generated dashboards (since you can just ask questions to drill down etc.) though in my experience I don't usually need to adjust the dashboard often.
I am curious if anyone here has used these tools? What was the experience like?
Some of the tools are getting better, but I can't help but think they still aren't really solving a problem.
If you're technically minded with some experience in data, then none of them are doing anything better/faster than what you can do with SQL or a BI tool.
If you're on the business side, they still aren't good enough because as the other poster said, you are reliant on a semantic layer so it's not that much better/faster than asking someone for a new dashboard.
The only way these tools can be halfway effective is if they sit on top of a well manicured semantic layer. I also think that the real winner will be the platform that figures out how to invoke an action from the insight. I.e. the analysis picks up on repeat customers and be able to recommend an action to take for those customers and then kick off the process with a simple push of a button …or if the action is low risk enough to do it automatically.
So my question is - who is actually using this stuff? Is anyone?
Second question - if you or your company use any of these tools - when did you start using them? How has the experience been so far?
I seriously think that at the end of the day maybe 1% or less of companies at any given point are at a data maturity stage where they could truly leverage cookie-cutter BI-AI solutions. The rest of us are still cleaning up messy data and figuring out what the proper business logic is.
Generative AI has gotten pretty good at descriptive analytics. i recently tried Gemini in Looker and as long as the tables had descriptive column names, it did a great job answering business questions that my stakeholders usually will go to a dashboard for.
I've been in analytics for 16 years, I have used most top models for interacting with data on the analytics maturity spectrum by now. Any job where the core KRA is building dashboards/ reports is already at risk as long as there's an appetite in your company to use AI.
It's garbage in garbage out process. If the underlying table has false/no data description or column names or misleading column names, it's set to come up with incorrect insights. No surprises there and it's more of a data problem than a Gen AI problem.
Reg: first layer, that's what I meant with the descriptive analytics. I've had a bit of success having AI explain what contributed to a spike or drop in a kpi but then I made sure proactively that it had access to data needed to derive that.
It's not able to do exploratory analysis...yet but we've barely crossed 2 years and the capabilities multiplied rapidly. It's just a matter of time it does a decent job on exploratory analysis and once that is accomplished, predictive analytics wouldn't be a far-fetched dream.
Having said this, it's a lot dependent on human governance (prompting, supplying credible data etc.) but those wouldn't be limited to just analysts. Anyone would be able to use natural language to interact with data.