Holistics vs Looker: AI-Powered BI Comparison

Feature-by-Feature Comparison Table
Dimension | | |
---|---|---|
Demo Playground Availability and quality of demo playground for testing the tool before purchase. | ||
| ❌ No free trial. Sales-led demo model for enterprise clients. source | |
Pricing Structure Pricing model and cost structure of the BI tool. | ||
| Platform & User-Based Platform pricing for core instance plus user-based pricing for Developer, Standard, and Viewer roles. source | |
| $9,000+/year Entry plan starts at $800/month. Enterprise plans available for larger teams. source | $35,000-150,000/year Base cost starts at $35,000-60,000/year. Average mid-sized company cost is $150,000/year. source |
Visualizations Chart and visualization capabilities of the tool. | ||
| Drag-and-drop canvas with diverse visualization options including tables, charts, and maps. source | |
| ![]() Custom plug-ins for visualizations through Looker Marketplace with community and partner options. source | |
| Custom Theming Comprehensive theming with custom CSS for brand alignment and styling. source | Embedded Interface Branding Customize Looker interface to match branding for external analytics and custom applications. source |
| Narrative Dashboarding Craft compelling data stories with automated narratives and insightful text summaries. source | |
Ease of Use & Self-Service How user-friendly and self-service oriented the tool is for non-technical users. | ||
| Drill-to-Row-Level Detail Expand filters and drill down to row-level detail for comprehensive data comprehension. source | |
| Marketplace Content Discovery Discover pre-built content, blocks, and custom plug-ins through Looker Marketplace. source | |
| Table Calculations & LookML Standard calculations via Table Calculations. Complex analyses require LookML modeling. source | |
| Drag-and-Drop Canvas Intuitive drag-and-drop canvas for creating visually appealing dashboards. source | |
| ![]() Natural language queries with AI assistant for data exploration and insights. source | Gemini AI Assistant AI assistant for visualization creation, formula building, data modeling, and report generation. source |
Data Delivery How data and reports are delivered to end users. | ||
| Data-Driven Alerts Create subscriptions and data-driven alerts based on insights for individual users and teams. source | |
| Secure Sharing Internal RBAC sharing and external distribution with multiple export formats. source | Content Sharing Guide Comprehensive documentation and guidance for effective content sharing within the platform. source |
Embedded Analytics Capabilities for embedding analytics into other applications. | ||
| Iframe + API Basic dashboard embedding and self-service embedding for report creation. source | API-Driven Embedded Powerful embedded capabilities with robust API coverage for extensive data experiences. source |
| Embedded Interface Branding Customize Looker interface to match branding for external analytics and custom applications. source | |
| Self-Service Embedding Embedded users can create and edit their own reports and dashboards. source | ❌ No embedded report builder for end users in embedded context. source |
Reliability & Performance System reliability, performance optimization, and monitoring capabilities. | ||
| In-Database Architecture In-database architecture optimizing performance by directly querying cloud databases in real time. source | |
| System Activity Explores System Activity Explores provide insights into user interactions, content engagement, and query performance. source | |
Semantic Modeling Data modeling and semantic layer capabilities. | ||
| ![]() Universal semantic modeling layer as single source of truth with LookML modeling language. source | |
| ![]() Git-based version control for data models with proprietary dashboard versioning capabilities. source | |
| ❌ No explicit automated metadata syncing from dbt or other warehouses into semantic layer. source | |
| LookML Analytics-as-Code LookML modeling language enables code-based definition of dimensions, measures, and business logic. source | |
Security and Governance Security features and governance capabilities. | ||
| Unified User Management Unified user management with SSO via Google Cloud IAM and role-based access control. source | |
| System Activity Explores System Activity Explores serve as audit logs for monitoring platform usage and system efficiency. source | |
| ❌ No explicit data masking or encryption features mentioned in documentation. source | |
| System Activity Explores System Activity Explores provide insights into user interactions, content engagement, and query performance. source |
Compare Holistics with:
Compare Looker with:
Community Discussions
Discover what other practitioners are discussing about this topic.
Yes, mostly I use it for refining my SQL queries or to see what are the different ways in which I can solve the same problem. It's quite helpful in that sense.
I also use it to review queries of my juinor team members. To see if I may have missed out on anything. It helps with that extra set of eyes at times.
And to create documentation for dashboards/reports.
I also use it to ask questions which I can use in stakeholder meetings for requirement gathering. For eg, I explain the context of the meeting and then ask the AI to roleplay with regards to what questions I should be asking in that specific meeting. Helps me prepare and also helps understand perspectives from different POVs.
My guess is that the bulk of the companies are just bull$#!7ing with the buzzword. To successfully introduce AI into your BI, you need clean orderly data.
Go ahead and tell me the last time everyone cheered when the data governance team came through the door.
People mostly rool their eyes and crawl into a ball.
So - C suite seems to think AI can “answer all their questions”.
So I respond with “what are the questions you are wondering? I can pull data, schedule reports, to your inbox, or build live dashboards with graphs in any color of the rainbow!” - which is usually met with blank stares.
That’s why I know AI isn’t worth the trouble. It’s a solution to a problem we don’t have.
I am not a professional analyst but I have use ChatGPT in the past to help me write SQL queries, so I can see some appeals with them, although I also can't imagine how these tools can deal with the messy nature of badly maintained tables with duplicated names and nonsensical field names etc.
I also see some of these tools advocate for dynamically generated dashboards (since you can just ask questions to drill down etc.) though in my experience I don't usually need to adjust the dashboard often.
I am curious if anyone here has used these tools? What was the experience like?
Some of the tools are getting better, but I can't help but think they still aren't really solving a problem.
If you're technically minded with some experience in data, then none of them are doing anything better/faster than what you can do with SQL or a BI tool.
If you're on the business side, they still aren't good enough because as the other poster said, you are reliant on a semantic layer so it's not that much better/faster than asking someone for a new dashboard.
The only way these tools can be halfway effective is if they sit on top of a well manicured semantic layer. I also think that the real winner will be the platform that figures out how to invoke an action from the insight. I.e. the analysis picks up on repeat customers and be able to recommend an action to take for those customers and then kick off the process with a simple push of a button …or if the action is low risk enough to do it automatically.
So my question is - who is actually using this stuff? Is anyone?
Second question - if you or your company use any of these tools - when did you start using them? How has the experience been so far?
I seriously think that at the end of the day maybe 1% or less of companies at any given point are at a data maturity stage where they could truly leverage cookie-cutter BI-AI solutions. The rest of us are still cleaning up messy data and figuring out what the proper business logic is.
Generative AI has gotten pretty good at descriptive analytics. i recently tried Gemini in Looker and as long as the tables had descriptive column names, it did a great job answering business questions that my stakeholders usually will go to a dashboard for.
I've been in analytics for 16 years, I have used most top models for interacting with data on the analytics maturity spectrum by now. Any job where the core KRA is building dashboards/ reports is already at risk as long as there's an appetite in your company to use AI.
It's garbage in garbage out process. If the underlying table has false/no data description or column names or misleading column names, it's set to come up with incorrect insights. No surprises there and it's more of a data problem than a Gen AI problem.
Reg: first layer, that's what I meant with the descriptive analytics. I've had a bit of success having AI explain what contributed to a spike or drop in a kpi but then I made sure proactively that it had access to data needed to derive that.
It's not able to do exploratory analysis...yet but we've barely crossed 2 years and the capabilities multiplied rapidly. It's just a matter of time it does a decent job on exploratory analysis and once that is accomplished, predictive analytics wouldn't be a far-fetched dream.
Having said this, it's a lot dependent on human governance (prompting, supplying credible data etc.) but those wouldn't be limited to just analysts. Anyone would be able to use natural language to interact with data.